Appendix: on the Variety of the mixture from Sex–Number Combinations

Appendix: on the Variety of the mixture from Sex–Number Combinations

Fuchs, Z., Polinsky, M., and you may Scontras, G. (2015). The fresh new differential sign regarding count and you may sex inside the Foreign language. Linguist. Rev. thirty-two, 703–737.

Hartsuiker, R., Schriefers, H., Bock, K., and you can Kikstra, G. Meters. (2003). Morphophonological impacts toward structure out-of subject-verb contract. Mem. Cogn. 30, 1316–1326.

Heycock, C., and you can Zamparelli, Roentgen. (2005). Friends and you may associates: plurality, dexterity, together with framework away from DP. Nat. Lang. 13, 201–270.

Hinojosa, J., Martin-Loeches, Yards., Casado, P., Munoz, F., and Rubia, F. (2003). Parallels and you may differences between phrase structure and morphosyntactic violations from inside the Foreign language: an event-related potentials studies. Lang. Cogn. Process. 18, 113–142.

Igoa, J. Meters., Garcia-Albea, J. Age., and you may Sanches-Casas, R. (1999). Gender-number dissociation when you look at the sentence production inside Language. Ital. J. Linguist. eleven, 163–196.

Krstev, C., and Vitas, D. (2005). “Corpus. and you can Lexicon – Mutual Incompletness,” in the Procedures of one’s Corpus Linguistics Appointment, eds P. Danielsson and Yards. Wagenmakers, Liverpool.

Malko, Good., and you can Slioussar, N. (2013). “Appeal errors inside sex arrangement: Research out-of Russian,” inside the Proceedings Specialized Ways to Slavic Linguistics: The 3rd Indiana Meeting, eds S. Franks, et al. (Ann Arbor: Michigan University Push), 162–175.

). “Last conjunct arrangement during the Slovenian,” during the Procedures of Authoritative Ways to Slavic linguistics 2006, eds Rpton, Yards. Goledzinowska, and you will U. Savchenko (Ann Arbor: Michigan Slavic E-books), 210-227.

Mitic, I., and you will Arsenijevic, B. (2019). Architectural ambiguity and you may optionality regarding contract patterns when you look at the Bosnian/Croatian/Serbian conjunct agreement. An effective J. Gen. Linguist. 4:6.

Nevins, A., Dillon, B., Malhotra, S., and you will Phillips, C. (2007). The new role regarding element-number and show-type in control Hindi verb arrangement abuses. Mind Res. 1164, 81–94.

Puskar, Z., and you can Murphy, An effective. (2015). “Closest conjunct contract into the serbo-croatian: a tip-purchasing account,” from inside the Topics on InfL. Linguistische Arbeitsberichte (LAB), Vol. ninety-five, eds A good. Assmann, S. Financial, D. Georgi, T. Klein, P. Weisser, and Elizabeth. Zimmermann (Leipzig: Universitat Leipzig), 441–482.

Vigliocco, G., Butterworth, B., and Garrett, Yards. F. (1996). Subject-verb contract during the Foreign-language and you can English: variations in the fresh new character regarding abstract constraints. Knowledge 61, 261–298.


Willer-Gold, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Yards., Becker, Meters., Cordalija, Letter., Kresic, M., et al. (2018). When linearity exists over ladder inside the sentence structure. PNAS 115, 495–five-hundred. doi: /pnas.1712729115

The newest five logically you can easily combos as well as their characteristics try represented in (21)

Willer-Silver, J., Arsenijevic, B., Batinic, Yards., Cordalija, N., Kresic, Yards., Leko, Letter., mais aussi al. (2016). Morphosyntactic production of coordination agreement inside South Slavic–a relative investigation. J. Slavic Linguist. twenty-four, 187–224.

It area describes certain technology issues about your options produced in the design of our check out, during the white of your own unique attributes out of South carolina morphology. It is aligned primarily for these looking the fresh theoretical and you may detailed linguistic, in the place of psycholinguistic areas of the analysis.

Within our experimental build, we have capitalized towards fact that when you Shreveport escort service look at the South carolina NSg nouns avoid in a choice of -age or in -o, and this its plural results in -an excellent, when you’re meanwhile FSg nouns cause -a, and their plural versions cause -e. It efficiency an excellent crossed, yet , incomplete syncretism.

The blend out-of NSg and you can FPl allows the synthesis of restricted pairs between a great syncretic and you may a low-syncretic collection of nouns, due to the fact combination of NPl and you will FSg makes it possible for only 1 options, that is syncretic.

We utilized restricted sets such as (20a) within critical stimuli. Brand new picked alternative, not, enables a few sandwich-choices, based and that intercourse–number integration appear as very first, and you may hence since the last conjunct. It was decided by another similar consideration.

The verb bears brand new endings: -o for NSg, -a concerning NPl and you may FSg, otherwise -elizabeth to possess FPl – we.elizabeth., possible identify NSg out-of FPl towards verb. Consequently, besides the unambiguously default masculine finish -we, when a beneficial verb in -e is put, we were sure it had been FPl, and if a beneficial verb in -o try put, i realized that it was NSg. Yet not, whenever a good verb when you look at the -an is delivered – it was unsure if this was plural, agreeing into the sex on the very first conjunct (NPl), or it actually was singular and you may agreed inside the sex to your last conjunct (FSg).

Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *